б) на иностранных языках 1.

Abi-Saab G. The Uses of Article 19 //EJIL. 1999. No. 2. 3.

Ago R. La colpa neirillecito internazionale // Scritti giuridici in onore di Santi Romano.

Bowett W. Crimes of State and the 1996 Report of the International Law Commission on State Resposibility// EJIL. 1998. No. 2. 5.

Casscse A. Ex injuria jus oritur: Arc We Moving towards International Legitimization of Forcible Humanitarian Countermeasures in the World Community? // EJIL. 1999. No. 1. 6.

Cavard L. Le sanctions dans le cadre de Г ONU // Recueil des Cours. 1952-1. Vol. 80. 7.

Charney J. Third States Remedies in International Law // Mich. JIL. 1988. No. 1. 8.

Condorelli L. L'imputation a l'Etat d'un fait internationalement illicite: solutions classiques et nouvelles tendances // RdC. 1984-VI. Vol. 189. 9.

Dupuy P.-M. The International Law of State Responsibility: Revolution or Evolution? // Mich. JIL. 1990. No. 1. 10.

Elagab 0. The Place of Non-Forcible Counter-Measures in Contemporary International Law // The Reality of International Law. Oxford, 1999. 11.

Eustathiades С. Les sujets du droit international et la rcsponsabilii international//RdC. 1953-III. T 84. 12.

Fiumel H. de. W sprawie pojqcia odpowiedzialnosci panstwa we wspolczesnym prawie mi^dzynarodowym // Panstwo I Prawo. 1976. Nr. 3. 13.

Garcia Amador F. State Responsibility — Some New Problems // RdC. Vol. 94. T 1958-11. 14.

Graefrath B. Complicity in the Law of International Responsibility // Revue beige de droit international. Vol. 29. 1996. 15.

Horbach N. The Confusion about State Responsibility and International Liability// Leiden J1L. Vol. 4.1991. 16.

Migliorino L. Sue la declaration d'iliceite comme frorme de satisfaction // RGDIP Vol. 96.1962. 17.

Nady K. Some Theoretical Problems of the Responsibility of States in International Law // Acta Universitatis Szegedienses.

Paul V. The Abuse of Rights and Bona Fides in International Law // OZORV. Bd. 28. 1977. H. 1-2. 19.

Pauwetyn J. The Concept of «Continuing Violation» of International Obligation // ВYBIL. Vol. 66. 1995. 20.

Perez Conzales M. Les organizations internationals et le droit de la responsabilitf // RGDIR Vol. 92.1988. No. 1. 21.

Perkins J. The Changing Foundations of International Law: From State Consent to State Responsibility // Boston University International Law Journal. Vol. 15. 1999. No. 2. 22.

Przetacznik F. La responsibilite Internationale de l'Etat a raison des prejudices de caractere moral et politique causes a un autre Etat // RGDIP. Vol. 78. 1974. 23.

Simma B. Counter-Measures and Dispute Settlement // EJIL. 1994. No. 1. 24. Skubiszewski К. Use of Force by States I I Manual of International Law. L., 1968. 25.

Sonncnfcld R. Podstawowe zasady odpowiedzialnosci mi?dzynarodowej panstwa // Odpowiedzialnosc panstwa w prawie mi?dzynarodowym. Warszawa, 1980. 26.

Sorensen M. Le problcme intertemporel dans Papplication de la Convention europeene de l'homm // Melanges offerts a Polis Modinos. Paris, 1968. 27.

Strupp K. Das vSlkerrcchtliche Delikt // Jahrbuch des V61kerrechts. Bd. III. Stuttgart, 1920. 28.

Tomuschat C. Crimes by States: An Endangered Species? // International Law: Theory and Practice. The Hague, 1998. 29.

Tomuschat Ch. Are Counter-measures Subject to Prior Recourse to Dispute Settlement Procedures? // EJIL. 1994. No. 1. 30.

Vitta E. Rcsposabilidad de los Estados // Rcvista espanole de derccho internacional. Vol. XII. 1959. 31.

Wedgwood R. The Enforcement of the Security Council Resolution 687 // AJIL. 1998. No. 3. 32.

Wolfke K. Zagadnienie odpowiedzialnosci majatkowej panstw w Swietle wsp61czesncgo prawa mi^dzynarodowcgo // Problemy odpowiedzalnosci majatkowej panstw RWPG. Wroclaw, 1975. 1 Алексеев С.С. О понятии права. - «Правоведение», 1970. № 1. С. 23.

1 Там же. С. 50.

'Там же. С.41.

1 Лукашук И.И. Право международной ответственности. М. 2004. С. 214.

1 Ушаков Н.А. Курс международного права. В семи томах. Т.З. М. 1990. С. 238.