б) на иностранных языках. 133.

Akande D. The Competence of International Organizations and the Advisory Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice. // European Journal of International Law. 1998. Vol.9 №3. P. 347-467. 135.

Alvarez J. E. The new treaty makers // Boston College International and Comparative Law Review. Vol. 25.2002. P. 213-234. 136.

Anderson K. Global impacts of Doha trade reform scenarios on poverty. - World Bank. Development research group. 2005. 137.

Anghie A. Time present and time past: globalization, international financial institutions, and the third world. // International law and politics. Vol. 32:243. 2000. P. 243-290. 138.

Bacchus J. Table Talk: Around the Table of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization // Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law. Vol 35. № 4. 2002. P. 1021-1039. 139.

Berry D. S. Law of International Organisations. - The University of the West Indies Faculty of law. 2004. 140.

Bhala R. The myth about stare decisis and International Trade Law // American University International Law Review. 1999. Vol. 14, № 4. P. 845-956. 141.

Boyle A.E. Some reflections on the relationship of treaties and soft law // International comparative law quarterly. - L., 1999. - Vol. 48, N 4. - P. 901-913. 142.

Bronckers M.C.E.J. More power to the WTO? // Journal of International Economic Law, Volume 4, Issue 1, P. 41-65. 143.

Brower C.H. Structure, Legitimacy, and NAFTA's Investment Chapter // Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law. Vol. 36:37.2003. P. 37-94. 144.

Cameron J., Kevin R. Gray. Principles of international law in the WTO Dispute settlement body. // International and comparative law Quarterly Vol.50.

Carreau D. Why not merge the International Monetary fund (IMF) with the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (World Bank). Fordham Law Review. 1994 May. 146.

Carty A. Critical International Law: Recent Trends in the Theory of International Law. //European Journal of International Law Vol.12 №1. P.66-96 147.

Cassese A. International law. - Oxford University press. 2001. 148.

Charney J.I. The impact on the international legal system of the growth of International Courts and Tribunals. //New York University Journal of International Law and Politics. 1999. Vol. 31:697. P. 697 - 708. 149.

Charnovitz S. WTO cosmopolitics. // International law and politics. Vol. 34:299.2002. P. 299-354. 150.

Chimni B.S. International Institutions Today: An Imperial Global State in the Making. // European Journal of International Law. 2004 Vol.15 №1 p. 1-37 151.

Cini M. From Soft Law to Hard Law: Discretion and Rule-making in the Commission's State Aid Regime. // European forum series. RSC №2000/35 152.

Cninkin C.M. The challenge of soft law: development and change in international law.// The International and Comparative Law Quartely, Vol. 38, 1989. P. 850-866. 153.

Cullet P. Differential Treatment In International Law: Towards A New Paradigm Of Inter-State Relations // European Journal of International Law 1999. Vol.10. №3. P.549-583. 154.

Danilenko G.M. International Jus Cogens: Issues of Law-Making. // European Journal of International Law 1991. Vol.2 №1. P. 42-66. 155.

Ginsburg T. International Judicial Lawmaking. // University of Illinois College of Law. Law and Economics Working Papers. 2005. Paper 26. P. 1-55. 156.

Haas E. The Uniting of Europe. L., 1958. 157.

Hay P. Federalism and supranational organizations. Patterns for new legal

structures. University of Illinois, 1996. 158.

Hillgenberg H. A Fresh Look at Soft Law. // European Journal of International Law. 1999. Vol.l0№3. P.

Hunter J. Broken promises: trade, agriculture and development in the WTO. // Melbourne Journal oflnternational Law. Vol. 4.2003. P.299-322. 160.

Ingelse C. Soft Law ? // Polish Yearbook oflnternational Law 20 (1993), P. 75- 90. 161.

International economic governance and non economic concerns: new challenges for the international legal order. / ed. by Griller. S. New York: Springer. 2003. 162.

International Trade Statistic 2004. [Электронный ресурс]: Официальный сайт Всемирной Торговой Организации. Режим доступа: http://www.vs1o.org/english/res_e/statis_e/its2004_e/its04joc_e.htm, свободный. — Загл. с экрана. — Яз. англ. 163.

Jackson J.H. International Economic Law In Times That Are Interesting. // Journal of international economic law. March 2000. Vol. 3(1). P. 3-14. 164.

Joost P. The Limits of Litigation: "Americanization" and Negotiation in the Settlement of WTO Disputes. H Ohio state journal on dispute resolution. Vol. 19:1. 2003. P. 121-140. 165.

Kunz J. Supranational organs // American Journal oflnternational Law. - 1952. - Vol. 4. - P.695-698. 166.

Kurtz J. Developing countries and their engagement in the World trade organization: an assessment of the Cancun Ministerial.// Melbourne Journal of International Law. Vol. 5.2004. P. 280-297. 167.

Lindroos A., Mehling M. Dispelling the Chimera of 'Self-Contained Regimes' International Law and the WTO. // European Journal oflnternational Law. Vol. 17 (2005) No. 5. P. 857-879. 168.

Lowenfeld A. F. The international monetary system and the erosion of sovereignty. // Boston College International and Comparative Law Review Volume 25 2002 Number 2. P. 257-272. 169.

Matsushita M. Basic principles of the WTO and the role of competition policy. // Washington university global studies law review. Vol. 3:363.2004. P. 363-385. 170.

McCann D. Small states in globalizing markets: The end of national economic sovereignty?//International law and politics. Vol.

McCrudden C., Gross S. G. WTO Government Procurement Rules and the Local Dynamics of Procurement Policies: A Malaysian Case Study. // European Journal of International Law. Vol. 17 (2006) No. 1. P. 185-214. 172.

McRae D. M. The WTO In International Law: Tradition Continued Or New Frontier? // Journal of International Economic Law, 2000. Vol. 3. P. 27-41. 173.

Moshe H. The Responsibility of International Organizations toward Third Parties: Some Basic Principles. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1995. 174.

Mulvena M.M. Has the WTO Gone Bananas? // New England International and Comparative Law Annual. Vol. 7. 2001. P. 177- 192. 175.

Palmeter D., Mavrodis P. Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization - Practice and Procedure. - Kluwer Law International. 1999. 176.

Palmeter D., Mavrodis P. The WTO Legal System: Sources of Law.// American Journal of International Law. July 1998. Vol. 92 №3. 177.

Panitchpakdi S. The WTO after 10 years: the lessons learned and the challenges ahead. [Электронный ресурс]: Официальный сайт Всемирной Торговой организации. Режим доступа: http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/spsp_e/spsp35_e.htm, - свободный. — Загл. с экрана. — Яз. англ. 178.

Paton P.D. Legal Services and the GATS: Norms as Barriers to Trade. // New Eng. J. Int'l & Сотр. L. Vol. 9:2.2003. P. 361-416. 179.

Petersmann E.U. The Transformation of the World Trading System through the 1994 Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization. // European Journal of International Law. 1995. Vol.6 №2. P. 161-222. 180.

Petersmann E.U. The GATTAVTO. Dispute settlement system.- Nijhoff Law specials 23. Wolters Kluwer. 1997. 181.

Petros M. C. Remedies in the WTO Legal System: Between a Rock and a Hard

Place. // European Journal oflnternational Law Vol.11 №4 2000. P.763-813. 182.

Raustiala K. Rethinking the sovereignty debate in international economic law. //Journal of the International Economic Law. 2003. № 6 P.841-878. 183.

Regionalism and the world trading system. - World Trade Organization. Geneva. 1995. 184.

Reinisch A., Irgel K. The participation of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in the WTO dispute settlement system. // Non-State Actors and International Law. Vol. 1. №2. 2001. P. 127-151. 185.

Scharpf F., Governing in Europe. Effective and Democratic? - Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1999. P. 104-110. 186.

Seidl-Hohenveldern. International Economic Law. General course on Public International Law// Collected courses of the Hague Academy oflnternational Law. 1986., V.III.Boston, 1987. 187.

Snyder F. Soft law and institutional practice in the European Community. // European University Institute Working paper. 1993. LAW №93/5. 188.

Somek A. On Supranationality// European integration online papers. Vol. 5 (2001) №3. P.l-15. 189.

Stoltenberg C., DiMatteo L. A., Dosanjh K., Frantz P.L., Bowal P. The Doha Declaration and Beyond: Giving a Voice to Non-Trade Concerns Within the WTO Trade Regime. // Vanderbilt journal of transnational law. 2003. Vol. 36:95 P. 97- 160. 190.

Tanzi A. Decisions of the International Court of Justice and the Law of the United Nations. // European Journal oflnternational Law 1995. Vol.6 №4. P.539- 572. 191.

The Future of the WTO. Addressing institutional challenges in the new millennium. Report by the Consultative Board to the Director-General Supachai Panitchpakdi., - World Trade Organization. 2004. 192.

Vandevert P.K. The Uruguay round and the World trade organization: a new era dawns in the private law of international customs and trade case. // W. RES. J. INTLL. Vol. 31:107.1999. P. 107-138. 193.

Weiler J. Does Europe Need a Constitution? Demos, Telos and the German Maastricht Decision. // European Law Journal 1995 Vol.3 P. 219-258. 194.

Weiler J. The Constitution of Europe. 4Do the New Clothes Have an Emperor?' and Other Essays on European Integration. 1999. 195.

Декларация 62-й Конференции Ассоциации международного права. [Электронный ресурс]: Официальный сайт Ассоциации международного права. Режим доступа: http://www.ila-hq.org/INDEX.htm, - свободный. — Загл. с экрана. — Яз. англ.